<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 3 Coming Together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-3-coming-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-3-coming-together/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Guite-St-Pierre</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-3-coming-together/comment-page-1/#comment-258178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Guite-St-Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2344#comment-258178</guid>
		<description>I both agree and disagree with that. Usually functionality losses come from plugin incompatibilities with new WordPress versions. That&#039;s not the WordPress Team fault&#039;s but the plugin developers&#039; fault and frankly, you can&#039;t expect plugin developer to update their plugin the same day a new version of WordPress comes out.

For real commercial and productivity development, I find it better to have different version and subversion of WordPress running and testing all installation and plugins individually and as a whole. That ensures nothing bad happens ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I both agree and disagree with that. Usually functionality losses come from plugin incompatibilities with new WordPress versions. That&#8217;s not the WordPress Team fault&#8217;s but the plugin developers&#8217; fault and frankly, you can&#8217;t expect plugin developer to update their plugin the same day a new version of WordPress comes out.</p>
<p>For real commercial and productivity development, I find it better to have different version and subversion of WordPress running and testing all installation and plugins individually and as a whole. That ensures nothing bad happens <img src='http://foolswisdom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robinvd</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-3-coming-together/comment-page-1/#comment-253909</link>
		<dc:creator>Robinvd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2344#comment-253909</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the headsup!

I&#039;m doing a graduation reserch project about WordPress. Testing the nightlybuilds can give me some cool topics about the upgrades and future features in 3.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the headsup!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing a graduation reserch project about WordPress. Testing the nightlybuilds can give me some cool topics about the upgrades and future features in 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Kent</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-3-coming-together/comment-page-1/#comment-253813</link>
		<dc:creator>A Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2344#comment-253813</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d prefer to see all of the 2.9 bugs (mass editing posts,image thumbnail cropping etc...) ironed out before we get a new 3.0 release. 

I&#039;ve found that wordpress first releases are never quite stable and tend to wait until .2 or .3 before upgrading unless there is a security patch. I view new releases of wordpress as Beta versions, I have lost count of how many times an upgrade has needed reversing because of a functionality loss.

It is very nice to have new versions and new features but it would be even nicer to have a bug free wordpress that takes a little more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d prefer to see all of the 2.9 bugs (mass editing posts,image thumbnail cropping etc&#8230;) ironed out before we get a new 3.0 release. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found that wordpress first releases are never quite stable and tend to wait until .2 or .3 before upgrading unless there is a security patch. I view new releases of wordpress as Beta versions, I have lost count of how many times an upgrade has needed reversing because of a functionality loss.</p>
<p>It is very nice to have new versions and new features but it would be even nicer to have a bug free wordpress that takes a little more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tschai</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-3-coming-together/comment-page-1/#comment-253780</link>
		<dc:creator>Tschai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2344#comment-253780</guid>
		<description>Although I appreciate the simplicity of the 2010 theme, there are so many more better/cooler/more functional/nicer themes out there which could...and maybe should have been the new default theme.

Good to hear 3.0 is getting done almost, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I appreciate the simplicity of the 2010 theme, there are so many more better/cooler/more functional/nicer themes out there which could&#8230;and maybe should have been the new default theme.</p>
<p>Good to hear 3.0 is getting done almost, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Hussey</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-3-coming-together/comment-page-1/#comment-253750</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2344#comment-253750</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certainly looking forward too it. Well, except for having to take new screenshots ... and re-doing some screencasts.

Of course Using WordPress ... including WordPress 3 does have a nice ring to it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certainly looking forward too it. Well, except for having to take new screenshots &#8230; and re-doing some screencasts.</p>
<p>Of course Using WordPress &#8230; including WordPress 3 does have a nice ring to it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

