<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Users, Customers, Members</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta2-9617</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Betty of zazbot.com</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/comment-page-1/#comment-73057</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty of zazbot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/#comment-73057</guid>
		<description>Well there are only so many words in the english lanquage to choose from. Don't like "user" either, but it's better than "d*ckhead", or worse.

Consumer sounds like "parasite". I think member is the best, as it gives the feeling of inclusion, which is perfectly in-line with infinity. We're all members and the sound of the word gives ya more of the warm fuzzy feeling.

Many marketing companies are smart enough to use the "member" handle.

Betty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there are only so many words in the english lanquage to choose from. Don&#8217;t like &#8220;user&#8221; either, but it&#8217;s better than &#8220;d*ckhead&#8221;, or worse.</p>
<p>Consumer sounds like &#8220;parasite&#8221;. I think member is the best, as it gives the feeling of inclusion, which is perfectly in-line with infinity. We&#8217;re all members and the sound of the word gives ya more of the warm fuzzy feeling.</p>
<p>Many marketing companies are smart enough to use the &#8220;member&#8221; handle.</p>
<p>Betty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/comment-page-1/#comment-62741</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/#comment-62741</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Sean. A common language is necessary for communication and that includes vocabulary. I see the mistaken again and again where people have the vision and the execution, but don't have the language to deliver their message.

I think you wonderfully describe what is a real tragedy. Do you have an article on the topic? Or favorite ones written by others?

I was thinking the other day after watching a cheezy movie where the protagonist was a  marketer, how the magic of marketing is often being able to have a conversation with people they don't have a natural repore with. Marketing is linguistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Sean. A common language is necessary for communication and that includes vocabulary. I see the mistaken again and again where people have the vision and the execution, but don&#8217;t have the language to deliver their message.</p>
<p>I think you wonderfully describe what is a real tragedy. Do you have an article on the topic? Or favorite ones written by others?</p>
<p>I was thinking the other day after watching a cheezy movie where the protagonist was a  marketer, how the magic of marketing is often being able to have a conversation with people they don&#8217;t have a natural repore with. Marketing is linguistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Moffitt</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/comment-page-1/#comment-62667</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Moffitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/#comment-62667</guid>
		<description>Lloyd,
I have to be honest , I haven't ever had an issue being called a user or for that matter a consumer (if the shoe fits,....). Semantically, member is a better term, makes you feel more of an equal part of the process - I'm just wondering how many companies that have members treat them, any better than users or consumers.

I think the real tragedy is that companies undervalue what (we'll call them members) bring to the table from a variety of roles - developers, ambassadors, beta testers, marketplace scouts, advisory council, content creators, word of mouth advocates, community managers...

Good question and debate...sometimes I just believe its a question of mission and passion not vocabulary...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd,<br />
I have to be honest , I haven&#8217;t ever had an issue being called a user or for that matter a consumer (if the shoe fits,&#8230;.). Semantically, member is a better term, makes you feel more of an equal part of the process - I&#8217;m just wondering how many companies that have members treat them, any better than users or consumers.</p>
<p>I think the real tragedy is that companies undervalue what (we&#8217;ll call them members) bring to the table from a variety of roles - developers, ambassadors, beta testers, marketplace scouts, advisory council, content creators, word of mouth advocates, community managers&#8230;</p>
<p>Good question and debate&#8230;sometimes I just believe its a question of mission and passion not vocabulary&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brightfeather</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/comment-page-1/#comment-62151</link>
		<dc:creator>brightfeather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/#comment-62151</guid>
		<description>Neither "consumers" nor "users" are terms that I have ever felt comfortable with. "Member" is definitely my preferred choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither &#8220;consumers&#8221; nor &#8220;users&#8221; are terms that I have ever felt comfortable with. &#8220;Member&#8221; is definitely my preferred choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Bowes</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/comment-page-1/#comment-61799</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Bowes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/#comment-61799</guid>
		<description>I don't mind being called a user.  Being called a member is kinda degrading though, since the literal meaning of "member" is an arm, leg or penis.  I see the metaphor, but that doesn't make it right. :)

Just kidding about being offended over being called a "member," but I &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; been called a lot worse than a consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind being called a user.  Being called a member is kinda degrading though, since the literal meaning of &#8220;member&#8221; is an arm, leg or penis.  I see the metaphor, but that doesn&#8217;t make it right. <img src='http://foolswisdom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just kidding about being offended over being called a &#8220;member,&#8221; but I <em>have</em> been called a lot worse than a consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce of authoritydirectory.com</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/comment-page-1/#comment-61694</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce of authoritydirectory.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/users-customers-members/#comment-61694</guid>
		<description>I guess I never really thought about being referred to as a user or consumer.  When you think about it though, it really is a bit de-humanizing.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I never really thought about being referred to as a user or consumer.  When you think about it though, it really is a bit de-humanizing.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
