<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TypePad SEO Blows&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark of wordpress-seo.org</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/comment-page-1/#comment-252641</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark of wordpress-seo.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=1106#comment-252641</guid>
		<description>I agree with Alec, he knows what he is talking about when it comes to Typepad SEO, because he brings up some issues about permalinks and general flexibility issues. Well written.

I am a big fan of Wordpress and try to get my friends to switch.

The news is Sixapart makes a nice little guide on how to switch. 

http://help.sixapart.com/tp/us/typepad_to_wordpress.html

That combined with a Wordpress redirection (I use Platinum SEO pack plugin) makes it a very easy process.

I also tell my friends to upgrade to Typepad premium before they switch because it is the only way you can do a redirect if you do not own your own domain name.

Over all I agree with the above Wordpress is the CMS of choice and moving to it from Typepad is very easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Alec, he knows what he is talking about when it comes to Typepad SEO, because he brings up some issues about permalinks and general flexibility issues. Well written.</p>
<p>I am a big fan of Wordpress and try to get my friends to switch.</p>
<p>The news is Sixapart makes a nice little guide on how to switch. </p>
<p><a href="http://help.sixapart.com/tp/us/typepad_to_wordpress.html" rel="nofollow">http://help.sixapart.com/tp/us/typepad_to_wordpress.html</a></p>
<p>That combined with a Wordpress redirection (I use Platinum SEO pack plugin) makes it a very easy process.</p>
<p>I also tell my friends to upgrade to Typepad premium before they switch because it is the only way you can do a redirect if you do not own your own domain name.</p>
<p>Over all I agree with the above Wordpress is the CMS of choice and moving to it from Typepad is very easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/comment-page-1/#comment-222390</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=1106#comment-222390</guid>
		<description>Curiously enough, the right answer to the question about whether Typepad or Wordpress is better for SEO is both are very good.

While the 15 character post limit is extremely annoying, limiting posts to 31 characters is actually a way to show a little respect to Google and the rest by not having long really spammy urls. Shorter URLs have been a help at various points on various search engines.

Typepad IP addresses are very clean (paying customers only) and get a special Google boost (we move lots of sites from &lt;a href=&quot;http://foliovision.com/2008/11/17/typepad-to-wordpress/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Typepad to Wordpress keeping permalinks intact&lt;/a&gt; and if the weblog moves onto a dirty IP just watch the rankings tumble). We try to insist our clients move to clean IP blocks and dedicated IPs but some of them have made other arrangements and can&#039;t be persuaded.

On the other hand, Wordpress lets you do exactly as you want. We&#039;ve added a javascript to our client sites which cuts off their slugs at 31 characters forcing them to create reasonable URL slugs.

Wordpress lets you add a plugin or two which turn excerpts into descriptions which again we limit at 155 characters via javascript in compliance with Google guidelines.

Wordpress SEO requires a bit of work, but done right on a clean dedicated IP is the best in the world. SEO though is not the area I would say Typepad falls down (at least until version two where they turned image names into numbers and cut the extension off causing display issues in at least Safari).

Addressing Jan&#039;s point about the editor in Wordpress - I don&#039;t like the editor/TinyMCE either (although the latest one is better). But guess what in Wordpress we were able to write &lt;a href=&quot;http://foliovision.com/seo-tools/wordpress/plugins/wysiwyg/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a better Wordpress WYSIWYG editor&lt;/a&gt; (subjective of course) and include all the image SEO and management routines we wanted and which doesn&#039;t break javascript. Try installing your own editor in Typepad or getting anything except numbered images in your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curiously enough, the right answer to the question about whether Typepad or Wordpress is better for SEO is both are very good.</p>
<p>While the 15 character post limit is extremely annoying, limiting posts to 31 characters is actually a way to show a little respect to Google and the rest by not having long really spammy urls. Shorter URLs have been a help at various points on various search engines.</p>
<p>Typepad IP addresses are very clean (paying customers only) and get a special Google boost (we move lots of sites from <a href="http://foliovision.com/2008/11/17/typepad-to-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">Typepad to Wordpress keeping permalinks intact</a> and if the weblog moves onto a dirty IP just watch the rankings tumble). We try to insist our clients move to clean IP blocks and dedicated IPs but some of them have made other arrangements and can&#8217;t be persuaded.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Wordpress lets you do exactly as you want. We&#8217;ve added a javascript to our client sites which cuts off their slugs at 31 characters forcing them to create reasonable URL slugs.</p>
<p>Wordpress lets you add a plugin or two which turn excerpts into descriptions which again we limit at 155 characters via javascript in compliance with Google guidelines.</p>
<p>Wordpress SEO requires a bit of work, but done right on a clean dedicated IP is the best in the world. SEO though is not the area I would say Typepad falls down (at least until version two where they turned image names into numbers and cut the extension off causing display issues in at least Safari).</p>
<p>Addressing Jan&#8217;s point about the editor in Wordpress &#8211; I don&#8217;t like the editor/TinyMCE either (although the latest one is better). But guess what in Wordpress we were able to write <a href="http://foliovision.com/seo-tools/wordpress/plugins/wysiwyg/" rel="nofollow">a better Wordpress WYSIWYG editor</a> (subjective of course) and include all the image SEO and management routines we wanted and which doesn&#8217;t break javascript. Try installing your own editor in Typepad or getting anything except numbered images in your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Debattista</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/comment-page-1/#comment-219034</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Debattista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=1106#comment-219034</guid>
		<description>Matt Cutts himself lately reinstated that the &#039;_&#039; is not yet regarded as a separator but it could be in the near future. Anyway always safer to use the &#039;-&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Cutts himself lately reinstated that the &#8216;_&#8217; is not yet regarded as a separator but it could be in the near future. Anyway always safer to use the &#8216;-&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tip Man of voice-broadcast.com</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/comment-page-1/#comment-162313</link>
		<dc:creator>Tip Man of voice-broadcast.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=1106#comment-162313</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s quite easy to see who&#039;s the best by exploring the Google search results. Majority of middleweight to top SEO experts are using either WordPress or a custom built blog soft. Anyone on Typepad? Almost none.

I agree with your point that WP is one of the best, however, if one fails to arrange your robots file the proper way, he might hit himself in the head with the duplicate content problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s quite easy to see who&#8217;s the best by exploring the Google search results. Majority of middleweight to top SEO experts are using either WordPress or a custom built blog soft. Anyone on Typepad? Almost none.</p>
<p>I agree with your point that WP is one of the best, however, if one fails to arrange your robots file the proper way, he might hit himself in the head with the duplicate content problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which Blog Platform is Best for SEO Website Design &#124; Make My Blog Successful</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/comment-page-1/#comment-161625</link>
		<dc:creator>Which Blog Platform is Best for SEO Website Design &#124; Make My Blog Successful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=1106#comment-161625</guid>
		<description>[...] my clientâ€™s heads. His opinion, by the way is easily discerned from the title of his post, â€œTypePad SEO Blowsâ€¦â€ (I love GREAT titles like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my clientâ€™s heads. His opinion, by the way is easily discerned from the title of his post, â€œTypePad SEO Blowsâ€¦â€ (I love GREAT titles like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/typepad-seo-blows/comment-page-1/#comment-160777</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=1106#comment-160777</guid>
		<description>@Eligio that is a great point!

Since version 2.3 (Sept 2007), WordPress has found an article if only a &lt;a href=&quot;http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.3#Pretty_URLs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;partial URL&lt;/a&gt; is provided. At first you may think this isn&#039;t very interesting, but consider how many emails you have received where the line breaks in the middle of a URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eligio that is a great point!</p>
<p>Since version 2.3 (Sept 2007), WordPress has found an article if only a <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.3#Pretty_URLs" rel="nofollow">partial URL</a> is provided. At first you may think this isn&#8217;t very interesting, but consider how many emails you have received where the line breaks in the middle of a URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
