<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three&#8217;s Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/threes-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/threes-company/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/threes-company/comment-page-1/#comment-240725</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2112#comment-240725</guid>
		<description>Though you may end up paying doubly or more later.

Documentation is no good if no one is using it -- you may be documenting the wrong thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though you may end up paying doubly or more later.</p>
<p>Documentation is no good if no one is using it &#8212; you may be documenting the wrong thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/threes-company/comment-page-1/#comment-240563</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2112#comment-240563</guid>
		<description>Three is ideal, but there isn&#039;t always time or money for ideal.  Sometimes there is only time and money to get by.

If you sufficiently document what you do you can get by well enough with two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three is ideal, but there isn&#8217;t always time or money for ideal.  Sometimes there is only time and money to get by.</p>
<p>If you sufficiently document what you do you can get by well enough with two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/threes-company/comment-page-1/#comment-240399</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2112#comment-240399</guid>
		<description>I actually saw some statistics showing that companies started with 3 founders have better success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually saw some statistics showing that companies started with 3 founders have better success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

