<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tagged.com Spam? Phishing? Nice Guys? My Personal Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/tagged-com-spam-phishing-nice-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/tagged-com-spam-phishing-nice-guys/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:43:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luitgard</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/tagged-com-spam-phishing-nice-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-239693</link>
		<dc:creator>Luitgard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2021#comment-239693</guid>
		<description>Tagged.com not only does spamming, they use sock puppets (fake IDs) and astrotrufing (fake &quot;grass roots&quot; support) to flood any forum that is justly critical of tagged.com with simple minded posts in support of tagged.com.  These posts are all made within a few minutes of each other and have a suspiciously similar style.  Consider yourself fortunate they overlooked you.   So why suspect Tseng and tagged.com of such fraud?  The facts are as follows: 1) Tagged.com was named the &quot;World&#039;s most annoying Web site&quot; by Time magazine for the scope of the latest barrage of fraudlent spam e-mail . As you mention, the NY State Attorney General has filed suit against tagged.com for it fraudulent practices. 2) Greg Tseng has a history of fraudulent e-mail campaigns on the Internet. Do a search on his name and crushlink, an e-mail scam from back in 2002 wherein people were sent fake e-mails that said, &quot;Someone has a crush on you&quot;.  To find out who it was, you had to give clushlink over 20 pingable e-mail addresses, which would then all receive an e-mail telling them &quot;Someone has a crush on you&quot;.  These e-mail addresses harvested under false pretenses were then sold to spammers. 3)  Later, in 2004 I believe, his company paid a $900,000 fine for fraudulent spamming for FreeFlixTix.  Tseng is a serial fraud and spammer with a track record of bad behavior that stretches over seven years and three separate companies.  That Reid Hoffman, Raj Kapoor &amp;  Allen Morgan would be involved with him speaks ill of them.  Either they have not exercised due diligence before forming their associations, or their ethics are appallingly lapse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagged.com not only does spamming, they use sock puppets (fake IDs) and astrotrufing (fake &#8220;grass roots&#8221; support) to flood any forum that is justly critical of tagged.com with simple minded posts in support of tagged.com.  These posts are all made within a few minutes of each other and have a suspiciously similar style.  Consider yourself fortunate they overlooked you.   So why suspect Tseng and tagged.com of such fraud?  The facts are as follows: 1) Tagged.com was named the &#8220;World&#8217;s most annoying Web site&#8221; by Time magazine for the scope of the latest barrage of fraudlent spam e-mail . As you mention, the NY State Attorney General has filed suit against tagged.com for it fraudulent practices. 2) Greg Tseng has a history of fraudulent e-mail campaigns on the Internet. Do a search on his name and crushlink, an e-mail scam from back in 2002 wherein people were sent fake e-mails that said, &#8220;Someone has a crush on you&#8221;.  To find out who it was, you had to give clushlink over 20 pingable e-mail addresses, which would then all receive an e-mail telling them &#8220;Someone has a crush on you&#8221;.  These e-mail addresses harvested under false pretenses were then sold to spammers. 3)  Later, in 2004 I believe, his company paid a $900,000 fine for fraudulent spamming for FreeFlixTix.  Tseng is a serial fraud and spammer with a track record of bad behavior that stretches over seven years and three separate companies.  That Reid Hoffman, Raj Kapoor &amp;  Allen Morgan would be involved with him speaks ill of them.  Either they have not exercised due diligence before forming their associations, or their ethics are appallingly lapse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/tagged-com-spam-phishing-nice-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-231924</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2021#comment-231924</guid>
		<description>Good points Hailin. I think one of the challenges is that our email address books includes a lot more than just our friends -- particularly when, for example, gmail automatically adds anyone that you&#039;ve emailed. And my email contacts expectations are a little different than contacts on a social networking site. Email contacts don&#039;t expect (or want) invites to other social networking sites.

By limiting the number of people you can invite from email contacts at one time -- and better yet, not having all the email addresses directly exposed in the first place -- it is a better experience for everyone. This is what I recommend Google do in &lt;a href=&quot;http://foolswisdom.com/gmail-responsible-too/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gmail’s Opportunity to Help Protect Against Tagged.com Mistake, Spam, and Phishing&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Hailin. I think one of the challenges is that our email address books includes a lot more than just our friends &#8212; particularly when, for example, gmail automatically adds anyone that you&#8217;ve emailed. And my email contacts expectations are a little different than contacts on a social networking site. Email contacts don&#8217;t expect (or want) invites to other social networking sites.</p>
<p>By limiting the number of people you can invite from email contacts at one time &#8212; and better yet, not having all the email addresses directly exposed in the first place &#8212; it is a better experience for everyone. This is what I recommend Google do in <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/gmail-responsible-too/" rel="nofollow">Gmail’s Opportunity to Help Protect Against Tagged.com Mistake, Spam, and Phishing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Hailin</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/tagged-com-spam-phishing-nice-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-231916</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Hailin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2021#comment-231916</guid>
		<description>It seems many other social networks including Facebook has adopted the approach to search through user&#039;s email contacts, but they are not as aggressive as Tagged.com. I think providing a choice before &quot;do you want to invite your friends to join ?&quot; and the default opt-out unless user clicks checkbox to select contacts is acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems many other social networks including Facebook has adopted the approach to search through user&#8217;s email contacts, but they are not as aggressive as Tagged.com. I think providing a choice before &#8220;do you want to invite your friends to join ?&#8221; and the default opt-out unless user clicks checkbox to select contacts is acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gmail Opportunity to Help Protect Against Tagged.com Mistake, Spam, and Phishing &#60; A Fool&#8217;s Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/tagged-com-spam-phishing-nice-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-230736</link>
		<dc:creator>Gmail Opportunity to Help Protect Against Tagged.com Mistake, Spam, and Phishing &#60; A Fool&#8217;s Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2021#comment-230736</guid>
		<description>[...] A Fool&#8217;s Wisdom A fool and his blog are soon parted.     &lt; Tagged.com Spam? Phishing? Nice Guys? My Personal Story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Fool&#8217;s Wisdom A fool and his blog are soon parted.     &lt; Tagged.com Spam? Phishing? Nice Guys? My Personal Story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
