<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Fool's Wisdom &#187; Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Built It or They Won&#8217;t Come</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/built-it-or-they-wont-come/</link>
		<comments>http://foolswisdom.com/built-it-or-they-wont-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Pilgrim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release Often]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;&#8230; Most of the successful versions of HTML have been “retro-specs,” catching up to the world while simultaneously trying to nudge it in the right direction. &#8230; &#8230; That’s not to say that all shipping code wins; after all, &#8230; &#8230; <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/built-it-or-they-wont-come/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8216;&#8230; Most of the successful versions of HTML have been “retro-specs,” catching up to the world while simultaneously trying to nudge it in the right direction. &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>That’s not to say that <em>all</em> shipping code wins; after all, &#8230; Code is necessary but not sufficient for success. &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The ones that win are the ones that ship.&#8217;</p>
<p>Mark Pilgrim, &#8220;<a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2009/11/02/why-do-we-have-an-img-element">Why do we have an IMG element?</a>&#8220;, Nov 2nd, 2009</p></blockquote>
<p>The article includes fascinating excerpts from some of the leaders in this almost-17-year-old work in progress, HTML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foolswisdom.com/built-it-or-they-wont-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

