<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Fool's Wisdom &#187; Participation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/tag/participation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GPL Isn&#8217;t a Good License for Proprietary Software</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/gpl-license-proprietary-software/</link>
		<comments>http://foolswisdom.com/gpl-license-proprietary-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=1993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I wrote about the clarification regarding WordPress Themes and the GPL (v2). Daniel Jalkut, who I featured as a personal WordPress Hero earlier this year, wrote one of the most interesting responses to &#8220;[WordPress] Themes are GPL, too&#8220;. Written &#8230; <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/gpl-license-proprietary-software/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I wrote about the clarification regarding <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/commercial-wordpress-themes-gpl2/">WordPress Themes and the GPL</a> (v2). <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/about/DanielJalkut.html">Daniel Jalkut</a>, who I featured as a <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/daniel-jalkut-wordpress-hero/">personal WordPress Hero</a> earlier this year, wrote one of the most interesting responses to &#8220;<a href="http://wordpress.org/development/2009/07/themes-are-gpl-too/">[WordPress] Themes are GPL, too</a>&#8220;. Written on Thursday and temporarily taken offline by <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/07/02/jalkut-gpl">the fireball</a>, Daniel&#8217;s &#8220;<a title="Permanent Link: Getting Pretty Lonely" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/825/getting-pretty-lonely">Getting Pretty Lonely</a>&#8221; article laments that WordPress is GPL, and that any open source software that uses a GPL license discourages developer community participation.</p>
<p>At first this article left me very upset, maybe because I found it quite persuasive, but then I reflected that for anyone developing and <strong>selling proprietary software</strong>, Daniel&#8217;s is the only position to believe in and promote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foolswisdom.com/gpl-license-proprietary-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

