<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Fool's Wisdom &#187; CBS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/tag/cbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress does one thing very well&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-awesome-cms/</link>
		<comments>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-awesome-cms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOCE Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=2769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;allow everyone to easily publish on the Web! And to make that happen, WordPress must be an easy to develop and design web publishing environment. Stop! This is comparing apples and oranges. [WordPress] is a honed, refined blogging product that &#8230; <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-awesome-cms/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;allow everyone to easily publish on the Web!</p>
<p>And to make that happen, WordPress must be an easy to develop and design web publishing environment.</p>
<blockquote><p>Stop! This is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apples_and_oranges">comparing apples and oranges</a>. [WordPress] is a honed, refined blogging product that does one thing very well, whereas Drupal is a flexible, extensible CMS plus a huge set of tools for building websites, web applications, and integrating with other tools.<br />
<cite>By &#8220;jam &#8211; Senior Wr&#8230;.&#8221;, &#8220;<a href="http://acquia.com/blog/jam/time-for-drupal-products">The time is right for Drupal products</a>&#8220;</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s frustrating that competitors are still trying to pigeon-hole WordPress. The satisfying irony is that I expect WordPress&#8217;s use for non-blog sites is growing faster than the competitors.</p>
<p>Sure, we have biases. We are biases towards familiarity, usability, and not stressing people &#8212;  letting people be awesome!</p>
<p>A leading example of what you can do with <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress 3.0</a> CMS <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_3.0">features</a> is what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBS">CBS</a>, with the help of <a href="http://vocecommunications.com/">VOCE Communications</a>, have already created for nearing 200 CBS Radio and CBS Local properties. Sites like:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://newyork.cbslocal.com/ ">newyork.cbslocal.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://kroq.radio.com/ ">kroq.radio.com</a></li>
</ul>
<p>There are countless other examples, but a few have been cataloged at <a href="http://wordpress.org/showcase/tag/cms/">wordpress.org/showcase/tag/cms/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foolswisdom.com/wordpress-awesome-cms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on 60 Minutes</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-on-60-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://foolswisdom.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-on-60-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 Minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Things D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ari Steinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Mcclure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lesley Stahl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on 60 Minutes. It is a great interview! My brother mentioned to me a few weeks ago seeing Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on 60 Minutes. This interview by Lesley Stahl with Mark didn&#8217;t disappoint. The interview &#8230; <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-on-60-minutes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080114/facebook-the-entire-60-minutes-segment/">Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on 60 Minutes</a>. It is a great interview!</p>
<p><span id="more-689"></span><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2323/2233419602_a5bb062321_t.jpg" width="100" height="37" alt="Facebook Logo" align="right" />My brother mentioned to me a few weeks ago seeing Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on 60 Minutes. This interview by Lesley Stahl with Mark didn&#8217;t disappoint. </p>
<p>The interview can be found in Kara Swisher article &#8220;<a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080114/facebook-the-entire-60-minutes-segment/">Facebook: The Entire â€˜60 Minutesâ€™ Segment</a>&#8221; Unlike Kara, I didn&#8217;t expect a &#8220;big wet kiss&#8221;, but Kara always compliments her excellent journalism with cynical editorial &#8212; for some reason I really enjoy it.</p>
<p>Kara also complains about no mention of MySpace, but I wonder how much rivalry there really is for 60 Minutes&#8217; audience. I know very few people personally that are active on MySpace &#8212; and those that are, are almost all are in bands.</p>
<p>I also disagree that &#8220;it hits all the high (and low) points of the Facebook saga&#8221;. It&#8217;s hits make for a balanced 15 minute piece. It misses the headlines in the news about children&#8217;s safety on Facebook and the Beacon fiasco being near deja vu of <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2208562130">the News Feed and Mini-Feed fiasco</a> a year before.</p>
<p>It also likely ends with a negative feeling for Mark and the Facebook team. Possibly, by reordering and going into more detail on the highs, people might appreciate what a phenomenon Facebook is &#8212; but maybe it isn&#8217;t necessary as people already know it is, because they are using it each week.</p>
<p>Likely not (yet) interesting to the 60 Minutes audience is Facebook&#8217;s <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/opensource.php">contributions to open source</a>. My former <a href="http://www.flock.com/">Flock</a> co-worker Ari Steinberg build and <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2220757130">announced</a> the <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2220757130">Facebook Toolbar for Firefox</a> </p>
<p>All my circles of friend and acquaintances at least known of Facebook, and many use it regularly. I greatly admire the Facebook experience and Mark and teams ability to solve problems others either haven&#8217;t tried or have failed at.</p>
<p><strong>Friday, Feb 1st Update:</strong> Kara Swisher yeterday reported <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080131/chatty-zuckerberg-tells-all-about-facebook-finances/">Chatty Zuckerberg Tells All About Facebook Finances</a> which includes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Revenue for Facebook for 2007 will be $150 million, as has been widely reported. But for 2008, Zuckerberg projected revenue to be increased to $300 to $350 million.</p>
<p>More interesting was the news that Facebook would spend $200 million next year on capital expenditures, which is a whole lot of servers.</p>
<p>By the way, more expenses, noted chatty Mark, those employee levels would rise to more than 1,000 in 2008 from 450 now.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/">Danny Sullivan</a>, <a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/">Dave Mcclure</a>, and others comment that it doesn&#8217;t sound like an inviting situation for potential employees hoping to make their fortunes. But Baher Al Hakim suggests this is a &#8220;a more-realistic financial outlook&#8221; and that there is opportunity to exceed these, because to date they have been so unsuccessful in getting money off their customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foolswisdom.com/facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-on-60-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

