Comments on: Survival: The rule of threes http://foolswisdom.com/survival-the-rule-of-threes/ A fool and his blog are soon parted. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:24:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta2-9617 hourly 1 By: foolswisdom http://foolswisdom.com/survival-the-rule-of-threes/comment-page-1/#comment-12890 foolswisdom Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:49:47 +0000 http://foolswisdom.com/survival-the-rule-of-threes/#comment-12890 Well many people would consider all three presuppose terrible conditions. One seldom knows when the conditions will change. It is not whether it is strictly true, a generalization, the value for me is it influenced thought and conversation. Well many people would consider all three presuppose terrible conditions.

One seldom knows when the conditions will change.

It is not whether it is strictly true, a generalization, the value for me is it influenced thought and conversation.

]]> By: Dylan http://foolswisdom.com/survival-the-rule-of-threes/comment-page-1/#comment-10815 Dylan Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:20:02 +0000 http://foolswisdom.com/survival-the-rule-of-threes/#comment-10815 For someone with such a strong dislike for generalizations, this is a surprising post. Also, I think the third rules presupposes terrible conditions while the first two presuppose at least normal conditions. For someone with such a strong dislike for generalizations, this is a surprising post.

Also, I think the third rules presupposes terrible conditions while the first two presuppose at least normal conditions.

]]>