<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Sexy Pictures&#8221;, &#8220;Hot Photos&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-151998</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-151998</guid>
		<description>it is sad that the word "adult" seems to only refer to nudity, even if it is artistic, whereas gory violence is not considered adult</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is sad that the word &#8220;adult&#8221; seems to only refer to nudity, even if it is artistic, whereas gory violence is not considered adult</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-130199</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-130199</guid>
		<description>I saw a discussion how the english language is changing rapidly and soon native english speakers will be outnumbered by those that speak english as a second or third language. 

This in turn is morphing the language into a simplified version of english that drops many of the nuances that those of us that grew up as english speakers take for granted. 

Also many words are ambiguous, like hot meaning hot in heat or hot meaning hot as a term of beauty for example. Stuff like that makes reading any language with a dictionary potentially very confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a discussion how the english language is changing rapidly and soon native english speakers will be outnumbered by those that speak english as a second or third language. </p>
<p>This in turn is morphing the language into a simplified version of english that drops many of the nuances that those of us that grew up as english speakers take for granted. </p>
<p>Also many words are ambiguous, like hot meaning hot in heat or hot meaning hot as a term of beauty for example. Stuff like that makes reading any language with a dictionary potentially very confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-113006</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-113006</guid>
		<description>The problem is also in the fact that there are different concepts of what is deserving of the label "pornography".  Sexy and Hot pictures might include nudity, or semi-nude displays of some sensual sort.  So it's called "porno" if there's nudity right?  Well, there's a difference between nudity and pornography also.  That's the blurred distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is also in the fact that there are different concepts of what is deserving of the label &#8220;pornography&#8221;.  Sexy and Hot pictures might include nudity, or semi-nude displays of some sensual sort.  So it&#8217;s called &#8220;porno&#8221; if there&#8217;s nudity right?  Well, there&#8217;s a difference between nudity and pornography also.  That&#8217;s the blurred distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nueva York of nuevayorkturismo.com</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-40479</link>
		<dc:creator>Nueva York of nuevayorkturismo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-40479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The differences between "sexy" and pornography area very big!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The differences between &#8220;sexy&#8221; and pornography area very big!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that girl again</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-38804</link>
		<dc:creator>that girl again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-38804</guid>
		<description>I suspect this may not just be a linguistic issue, but a cultural one. Many countries in mainland Europe have a far more liberal attitude towards public nudity than the US, and may well reserve relatively technical terms such as 'pornography' for particularly hardcore or even illegal stuff.

Why not do away with the troublesome ambiguous terminology and have a rating system? U for Club Penguin blogs, PG for anything by a grown-up, R to keep the kiddies away from the occasional iffy YouTube clip and X for porn. Allow users to decide for themselves which levels they want to be exposed to. You could then include X-rated blogs in the tag and dashboard pages of any users who have ticked a box confirming they are willing to see such content and that it is legal for them to do so in their jurisdiction. Much less patronising than hiding them from everyone, which discourages self-reporting and hence results in more adult material on public display rather than less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect this may not just be a linguistic issue, but a cultural one. Many countries in mainland Europe have a far more liberal attitude towards public nudity than the US, and may well reserve relatively technical terms such as &#8216;pornography&#8217; for particularly hardcore or even illegal stuff.</p>
<p>Why not do away with the troublesome ambiguous terminology and have a rating system? U for Club Penguin blogs, PG for anything by a grown-up, R to keep the kiddies away from the occasional iffy YouTube clip and X for porn. Allow users to decide for themselves which levels they want to be exposed to. You could then include X-rated blogs in the tag and dashboard pages of any users who have ticked a box confirming they are willing to see such content and that it is legal for them to do so in their jurisdiction. Much less patronising than hiding them from everyone, which discourages self-reporting and hence results in more adult material on public display rather than less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mousa ramezani</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-36458</link>
		<dc:creator>mousa ramezani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/sexy-pictures/#comment-36458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;in our country sexy web sites are filtered please send me a lot of very very hot sexy pictures&#038;films Iam irany.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in our country sexy web sites are filtered please send me a lot of very very hot sexy pictures&#038;films Iam irany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
