<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performancing for Flock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Not sure if you have figured this out already but if you right click the performancing icon in the status bar at the bottom, you can get it to open not only in a split pane, but also a new window or tab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if you have figured this out already but if you right click the performancing icon in the status bar at the bottom, you can get it to open not only in a split pane, but also a new window or tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Lloyd, for the headsup. Indeed, the build from the previous day is working pretty all right. So I will take it for a spin over the next couple of days and then let you know how it all went. Thanks again for letting us know about the recent issues. Hopefully, they will be fixed soon ! Keep up the good work !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lloyd, for the headsup. Indeed, the build from the previous day is working pretty all right. So I will take it for a spin over the next couple of days and then let you know how it all went. Thanks again for letting us know about the recent issues. Hopefully, they will be fixed soon ! Keep up the good work !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolswisdom</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>foolswisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-130&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@ Luis&lt;/a&gt; the timing of our discussion could not have been worse. &lt;a href=&quot;http://anarkystic.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Termie&lt;/a&gt; has checked in significant code to take the favorites manager much better, but it has temporarily broken most everything. The blogging part being unusable is documented in &lt;a href=&quot;http://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bug 1895&lt;/a&gt;.

I am using builds from the Wednesday, Dec 21 on MacOS and MSWin, and they work well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-130" rel="nofollow">@ Luis</a> the timing of our discussion could not have been worse. <a href="http://anarkystic.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">Termie</a> has checked in significant code to take the favorites manager much better, but it has temporarily broken most everything. The blogging part being unusable is documented in <a href="http://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895" rel="nofollow">bug 1895</a>.</p>
<p>I am using builds from the Wednesday, Dec 21 on MacOS and MSWin, and they work well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Hummm, Lloyd, it looks like things have not started very well with the latest build from Flock that I have picked up from here: http://tinderbox.flock.com/. I have grabbed the latest build from the 23rd of December and after I have installed it over the previous 0.4.10 and I get to start it up most of the &lt;i&gt;clickable&lt;/i&gt; options do not seem to be responding. So whenever I click on the blogging option nothing happens, I cannot even add / remove more blogging options and click on the hot buttons on the top left of the web browser nothing happens either. I have tried to reinstall and everything and it doesn&#039;t seem to be working very well. Has anybody else noticed the same or am I the only one with this problem. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hummm, Lloyd, it looks like things have not started very well with the latest build from Flock that I have picked up from here: <a href="http://tinderbox.flock.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tinderbox.flock.com/</a>. I have grabbed the latest build from the 23rd of December and after I have installed it over the previous 0.4.10 and I get to start it up most of the <i>clickable</i> options do not seem to be responding. So whenever I click on the blogging option nothing happens, I cannot even add / remove more blogging options and click on the hot buttons on the top left of the web browser nothing happens either. I have tried to reinstall and everything and it doesn&#8217;t seem to be working very well. Has anybody else noticed the same or am I the only one with this problem. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot, Lloyd, for the feedback comments and for the linkback. Regarding your comments on 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;[...] I am still interested in how Rich (normal) Editing and Live Preview are different.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think you make a good point. I think though it would an interesting option to have this Live Preview option as it would allow you to see &lt;i&gt;exactly&lt;/i&gt; how the weblog post would actually look like. Only thing that I am not sure I agree with is the fact that it does not show the hyperlinks as it should. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Qumana&lt;/a&gt;, despite the fact that it is also an WYSIWYG weblogging editor, has got this preview option where it does a very clean job on how the weblog post should look like. However, I do agree with you about the fact that if that feature would be left out I would think there wouldn&#039;t be too much of an impact.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Now, I see this save as “note” option, but I think of drafts and notes as very different things. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Although I haven&#039;t tried out the latest developments from the weblogging component from Flock, I must say that I find this Notes feature very handy. I know that drafts and notes would be different but if I take the example from other weblogging tools you have got lots of restrictions when creating the drafts whereas with this Notes option you can have many of them storing those different weblog posts you may be working on. And just grabbing their content is just a single click away. I find that is a very powerful feature, specially for advanced webloggers. I will let you know of my experience when I try the latest build from Flock though and see how it actually feels like.

Regarding your comments about SpellBound your link to Asa does not seem to be active, at least, it is not working with me, but I have installed the extension as well and will have a look and see how it actually goes. Thanks for the tip, though. I hope it works out the way I expect it to. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Pingback/trackback in the client is something that we have considered for Flock, but many blogging platform do it themselves.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From this comment above I take you guys are not planning into incorporating Pingback/Trackback. If that is the case I would suggest you revisit it again as that is one of the key fundamental features that allows webloggers to not behave like islands in a huge ocean but as a complex network of islands linked to one another and with a connection by enabling conversations to take place. If that feature is not put together for Flock I would think that not many webloggers would take it into account, specially since quite a few webloggers are relying on them to get themselves a space in the Blogosphere. Anyway, thanks again for the feedback and look forward to trying out the latest build from Flock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot, Lloyd, for the feedback comments and for the linkback. Regarding your comments on </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;[...] I am still interested in how Rich (normal) Editing and Live Preview are different.&#8221;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>I think you make a good point. I think though it would an interesting option to have this Live Preview option as it would allow you to see <i>exactly</i> how the weblog post would actually look like. Only thing that I am not sure I agree with is the fact that it does not show the hyperlinks as it should. <a href="http://www.elsua.net/2005/10/20/qumana-making-your-content-readily-available-in-your-weblog-without-hardly-any-effort/" rel="nofollow">Qumana</a>, despite the fact that it is also an WYSIWYG weblogging editor, has got this preview option where it does a very clean job on how the weblog post should look like. However, I do agree with you about the fact that if that feature would be left out I would think there wouldn&#8217;t be too much of an impact.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;Now, I see this save as “note” option, but I think of drafts and notes as very different things. &#8220;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Although I haven&#8217;t tried out the latest developments from the weblogging component from Flock, I must say that I find this Notes feature very handy. I know that drafts and notes would be different but if I take the example from other weblogging tools you have got lots of restrictions when creating the drafts whereas with this Notes option you can have many of them storing those different weblog posts you may be working on. And just grabbing their content is just a single click away. I find that is a very powerful feature, specially for advanced webloggers. I will let you know of my experience when I try the latest build from Flock though and see how it actually feels like.</p>
<p>Regarding your comments about SpellBound your link to Asa does not seem to be active, at least, it is not working with me, but I have installed the extension as well and will have a look and see how it actually goes. Thanks for the tip, though. I hope it works out the way I expect it to. </p>
<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;Pingback/trackback in the client is something that we have considered for Flock, but many blogging platform do it themselves.&#8221;</i></p></blockquote>
<p>From this comment above I take you guys are not planning into incorporating Pingback/Trackback. If that is the case I would suggest you revisit it again as that is one of the key fundamental features that allows webloggers to not behave like islands in a huge ocean but as a complex network of islands linked to one another and with a connection by enabling conversations to take place. If that feature is not put together for Flock I would think that not many webloggers would take it into account, specially since quite a few webloggers are relying on them to get themselves a space in the Blogosphere. Anyway, thanks again for the feedback and look forward to trying out the latest build from Flock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolswisdom</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/performancing-for-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>foolswisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/performancing-for-flock/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsua.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Luis Suarez&lt;/a&gt; in a post titled &quot;Weblogging Directly from FireFox - Performancing for FireFox - Part Deux&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/22/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox-part-deux/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;) presents five things he likes and what needs improving in Performancing.  Every point is well made, though I am still interested in how Rich (normal) Editing and Live Preview are different. 

The notes thing confused me, and I could not figure out how to save quotes from web pages as notes. Now, I see this save as &quot;note&quot; option, but I think of drafts and notes as very different things. This is why Flock&#039;s shelfs is so useful for me, and why an integrated experience will be even more compelling as Flock develops.

In regards to Luis&#039;s comment about no spell checking, &lt;a&gt; Asa writes&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The latest development build of SpellBound integrates seamlessly with this blogging tool.&quot; Flock needs to get spell checking available to all form fields! (&lt;a href=&quot;http://bugs.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747&quot;&gt;bug&lt;/a&gt;)

Pingback/trackback in the client is something that we have considered for Flock, but many blogging platform do it themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.elsua.net" rel="nofollow">Luis Suarez</a> in a post titled &#8220;Weblogging Directly from FireFox &#8211; Performancing for FireFox &#8211; Part Deux&#8221; (<a href="http://www.elsua.net/2005/12/22/weblogging-directly-from-firefox-performancing-for-firefox-part-deux/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) presents five things he likes and what needs improving in Performancing.  Every point is well made, though I am still interested in how Rich (normal) Editing and Live Preview are different. </p>
<p>The notes thing confused me, and I could not figure out how to save quotes from web pages as notes. Now, I see this save as &#8220;note&#8221; option, but I think of drafts and notes as very different things. This is why Flock&#8217;s shelfs is so useful for me, and why an integrated experience will be even more compelling as Flock develops.</p>
<p>In regards to Luis&#8217;s comment about no spell checking, <a> Asa writes</a> &#8220;The latest development build of SpellBound integrates seamlessly with this blogging tool.&#8221; Flock needs to get spell checking available to all form fields! (<a href="http://bugs.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747">bug</a>)</p>
<p>Pingback/trackback in the client is something that we have considered for Flock, but many blogging platform do it themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

