<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naming your projects and products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/naming-your-projects-and-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/naming-your-projects-and-products/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta2-9617</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Haeger</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/naming-your-projects-and-products/comment-page-1/#comment-4817</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Haeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/naming-your-projects-and-products/#comment-4817</guid>
		<description>Lloyd:
Hey, I think it would really add some value to my original post to have you delineate exactly where I mixed target audience types in my examples. I think it might cement my point even better to highlight that even someone who would write such an article can still miss the mark. My main point was more to illuminate how we in OSS should be trying to steer our thinking about our goals. So, if you can show where I confused the audience, please post it so that I can link back with some supporting comment, eh?
--T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd:<br />
Hey, I think it would really add some value to my original post to have you delineate exactly where I mixed target audience types in my examples. I think it might cement my point even better to highlight that even someone who would write such an article can still miss the mark. My main point was more to illuminate how we in OSS should be trying to steer our thinking about our goals. So, if you can show where I confused the audience, please post it so that I can link back with some supporting comment, eh?<br />
&#8211;T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/naming-your-projects-and-products/comment-page-1/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foolswisdom.com/~lloyd/wordpress/index.php/naming-your-projects-and-products/#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>That was a good article and the first time I heard someone from the OS community suggest that there might be lay or not 100% techie people interested in OSS/linux. The naming and difficulty of installation (or at least the perception of) has kept me away from fully adopting oss as a solution. Naming goes a long way, as does the marketing efforts of enthusisasts and developers.

And I'd sign up for that Beavis gig anyday! Too funny. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a good article and the first time I heard someone from the OS community suggest that there might be lay or not 100% techie people interested in OSS/linux. The naming and difficulty of installation (or at least the perception of) has kept me away from fully adopting oss as a solution. Naming goes a long way, as does the marketing efforts of enthusisasts and developers.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d sign up for that Beavis gig anyday! Too funny. <img src='http://foolswisdom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
