<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CMSWire: WordPress dominates the Technorati&#8217;s Top 100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/</link>
	<description>A fool and his blog are soon parted.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous at sport-shoes.info</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/comment-page-1/#comment-105106</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous at sport-shoes.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=673#comment-105106</guid>
		<description>Sure, Wordpress is the most SEO Friendly CMS. Joomla is second best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, WordPress is the most SEO Friendly CMS. Joomla is second best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/comment-page-1/#comment-104297</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=673#comment-104297</guid>
		<description>Jesse, there&#039;s definitely tons of bias all over the place. People are very... passionate about blogging related topics.

I do celebrate passion and advocacy! Like you though I dislike when it is done under the guise of journalism.

What really impresses me about Brice is how he is shaping CMSWire into a journalistic offering -- a site telling all sides of CMS news stories. That is the type of site that I&#039;m likely to go to for news.

Aside, not that it is essential to the conversation, but it wasn&#039;t only the absense of WordPress coverage that I protested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, there&#8217;s definitely tons of bias all over the place. People are very&#8230; passionate about blogging related topics.</p>
<p>I do celebrate passion and advocacy! Like you though I dislike when it is done under the guise of journalism.</p>
<p>What really impresses me about Brice is how he is shaping CMSWire into a journalistic offering &#8212; a site telling all sides of CMS news stories. That is the type of site that I&#8217;m likely to go to for news.</p>
<p>Aside, not that it is essential to the conversation, but it wasn&#8217;t only the absense of WordPress coverage that I protested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Gardner</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/comment-page-1/#comment-104268</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=673#comment-104268</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your reply Lloyd.  Didn&#039;t intend to come across attacking.  I suppose if you&#039;re proficient with WP, you&#039;re going to want to promote it and see it covered thoroughly.  Your article indicated that you criticized Brice for not covering WordPress enough, but I find bias on both sides of the aisle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply Lloyd.  Didn&#8217;t intend to come across attacking.  I suppose if you&#8217;re proficient with WP, you&#8217;re going to want to promote it and see it covered thoroughly.  Your article indicated that you criticized Brice for not covering WordPress enough, but I find bias on both sides of the aisle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/comment-page-1/#comment-104258</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=673#comment-104258</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Jesse, but I&#039;m not quick following your argument. I&#039;m not passionate or knowledgeable about most aspects of Movable Type, so I won&#039;t be a good person to point out bias of The Blog Herald -- and to be honest, I seldom read articles on that site.

It&#039;s interesting you mention this in the more general context, because I was recently thinking about how powerful a brand is, a title it, and how people use/abuse them, and how it relates to speaking in the language our audience understands.

Specifically what made me think of this was &lt;a href=&quot;http://foolswisdom.com/scoble-broke-our-trust-and-the-law-by-sharing-our-personal-data/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dennis Howlett and Thomas Otter&#039;s crude arguments&lt;/a&gt; that Robert Scoble is a criminal. Near the end of &lt;a href=&quot;http://theotherthomasotter.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/facebook-scoble-manifestos-and-european-privacy-law/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thomas&#039;s original post&lt;/a&gt; it reads, &quot;Iâ€™m glad to see blawgs joining the discussion, for instance &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacylawyer.ca/blog/2008/01/facebook-prevents-scraping-of-profiles.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Canadian Privacy Law Blog&lt;/a&gt;&quot; A name like &quot;the Canadian Privacy Law Blog&quot; sounds collaborative and authorative to me, but when I went there, the blog makes it clear that it is a single lawyer David T.S. Fraser&#039;s blog. Don&#039;t get me wrong David T.S. Fraser blog might be very good, but the title through me off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Jesse, but I&#8217;m not quick following your argument. I&#8217;m not passionate or knowledgeable about most aspects of Movable Type, so I won&#8217;t be a good person to point out bias of The Blog Herald &#8212; and to be honest, I seldom read articles on that site.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting you mention this in the more general context, because I was recently thinking about how powerful a brand is, a title it, and how people use/abuse them, and how it relates to speaking in the language our audience understands.</p>
<p>Specifically what made me think of this was <a href="http://foolswisdom.com/scoble-broke-our-trust-and-the-law-by-sharing-our-personal-data/" rel="nofollow">Dennis Howlett and Thomas Otter&#8217;s crude arguments</a> that Robert Scoble is a criminal. Near the end of <a href="http://theotherthomasotter.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/facebook-scoble-manifestos-and-european-privacy-law/" rel="nofollow">Thomas&#8217;s original post</a> it reads, &#8220;Iâ€™m glad to see blawgs joining the discussion, for instance <a href="http://www.privacylawyer.ca/blog/2008/01/facebook-prevents-scraping-of-profiles.html" rel="nofollow">the Canadian Privacy Law Blog</a>&#8221; A name like &#8220;the Canadian Privacy Law Blog&#8221; sounds collaborative and authorative to me, but when I went there, the blog makes it clear that it is a single lawyer David T.S. Fraser&#8217;s blog. Don&#8217;t get me wrong David T.S. Fraser blog might be very good, but the title through me off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Gardner</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/comment-page-1/#comment-104240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=673#comment-104240</guid>
		<description>Hey Lloyd,

If you really are concerned about journalistic integrity, why not criticize sites like The Blog Herald that are heavily biased against Movable Type?  I guess my point is, if you&#039;re a fan of WordPress, that&#039;s fine.  I&#039;m a fan of Movable Type.  Just don&#039;t present it as a move to eliminate unjust and biased reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Lloyd,</p>
<p>If you really are concerned about journalistic integrity, why not criticize sites like The Blog Herald that are heavily biased against Movable Type?  I guess my point is, if you&#8217;re a fan of WordPress, that&#8217;s fine.  I&#8217;m a fan of Movable Type.  Just don&#8217;t present it as a move to eliminate unjust and biased reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://foolswisdom.com/cmswire-wordpress-dominates-the-technoratis-top-100/comment-page-1/#comment-103871</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolswisdom.com/?p=673#comment-103871</guid>
		<description>Wordpress is a great blogging platform. I have found Drupal better for true CMS projects, but Wordpress is a good middle ground for most user requirements.

It&#039;s interesting to see the dominance of Wordpress though. I think this is simply that it is a better product than many other offerings out there. Even perhaps some pay for solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress is a great blogging platform. I have found Drupal better for true CMS projects, but WordPress is a good middle ground for most user requirements.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see the dominance of WordPress though. I think this is simply that it is a better product than many other offerings out there. Even perhaps some pay for solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

